|

www.sopht.ca
Jeff
Duntemann's 12Volt tube page
The Sopht Amp was proposed on the AX84 site by Stephane.
His first post was a preliminary schematic for a low volume amp that he
requested comment upon. Being very close to the one year point of picking
up a soldering iron and having focused on low volume/ low voltage amps,
I felt it would be a fine project. I was aware of the "space charge"
tubes, but had never tried them. Within days I ordered the tubes and began
learning more about their specs. I created a couple of spice models to
be used to model the amp before I built it - this something I really enjoy,
regardless of its accuracy. Any comment/suggestions to improve the tube
model(s) is appreciated.
Some of the things that attracted me to this amp as
well as low voltage tube amp design.
- Amp can easily be brought up on batteries during
the initial wiring tests (cheap)
- Can use off the shelf power supplies- from wall warts
to old PC PSU units (free)
- Low tolerance requirement of the components make
it easy to scrounge parts from junk equipment (free)
- Can use low cost 70V line transformer for OT (cheap)
- Something different! (-huh?)
 |
My Design Goals
- Low gain amp with interesting high-mid and
treble breakup(as heard on Steph's samples)
- Try SC tubes-Are they any good?
- Attempt to spice model with higher accuracy
- Build inside a SCSI drive enclosure (free)
- Plan to use amp for close mic'd recording and
headphone practice (w/ effects pre and post)
-Click image to see large
|
|
Below is my version of the amp (06/10/04)
with rollover, showing voltages. I like the sound, not sure if my
variation brings anything drastic to the amp. I added a switch to
change the values of R2, R6 and C3 as these appear to change frequency
cutoff (shown on the simulation page). Currently I have the RS70v
OT connected to reflect 2.4k back to the 12k5, this sounded pretty
good to me on the first tests, I haven't gone back and retried the
600ohm tap which the tube is supposed to like (yet). (09/14/04)
went back and tried a few different taps the 689Ohm tap seemed to
be a bit louder as well as tighter sounding overall so that is what
I'm using now.
...about the wacky
symbols
|
 |
|